I'm trying to find a reference I once read about how the term "urban fantasy" is becoming a marketing term that doesn't mean any more what we once meant by urban fantasy. Topper and other Thorne Smith books would not be included.
I haven't found that, but I have found some links that might be of interest. So:
Carrie Vaughn's analysis of urban fantasy:
- http://carriev.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/c
arries-analysis-of-urban-fantasy-part-i-t he-formula/ - http://carriev.wordpress.com/2009/01/06/c
arries-analysis-of-urban-fantasy-part-ii-w hen-things-go-wrong/ - http://carriev.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/c
arries-analysis-of-urban-fantasy-part-ii i-deconstructing-urban-fantasy/
And some others:
- http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2009/0
6/23/vampire_fiction/index.html - http://stacia-kane.livejournal.com/10780
6.html?view=846878#t846878 - http://www.publishersweekly.com/blog/400
000640/post/70035807.html
It's interesting how the last fellow sees urban fantasy as coming more from the mystery end of things than the romance end. Hamilton seems to straddle the two, first picking one, later the other.
Edited later: Here's the posts I was thinking of--Lilith Saintcrow's discussion of modern urban fantasy. Unfortunately, I was wrong in that she doesn't get into the marketing discussion.
- http://fantasyhotlist.blogspot.com/2008/1
2/ad-lib-column-lilith-saintcrow.html - http://www.lilithsaintcrow.com/journal/2
008/12/more-thoughts-on-angry-chicks-in-l eather/
And a commentary on the first post of hers:
http://ofblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/on-tr
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif)
